by
March 6 – March 12, 2023
Security issues

Minsk leverages the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

The situation has not changed
Minsk leverages the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty
9P78-1 TEL of russian SRBM system Iskander-M from above, Victory Day Parade Moscow 2015. Author: Boevaya mashina. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

It is unlikely that a positive effect will result from the Belarusian authorities’ shift away from their previous stance on arms control. The West is convinced that Minsk is an appendage of the Russian military machine and will interpret such acts as Kremlin intrigue rather than an independent initiative by Lukashenka.

The official spokesman of the Ministry of Defence of Belarus reported that exercises would be held simulating strikes against targets such as command centres and ammunition depots using the Iskander-M missile systems recently received from Russia. The Iskander-M is capable of hitting targets at ranges over 500 km, though the tactical and technical characteristics of the missiles supplied to Minsk have not been disclosed.

Wittingly or unwittingly, such steps violate the Soviet-American Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (the INF treaty), realising the allegations previously levelled by the USA against Russia and leading to the former withdrawing from the agreement in 2019. At the time, Minsk declared that it was committed to the treaty and proposed an initiative to abandon the deployment of intermediate and short-range missiles in the region.

Officially, Minsk continues to adhere to the treaty, despite vague and informal statements about acquiring weapons outside its scope. Moreover, Russia continues to deny that the Iskander-M missiles have a range constituting a violation of treaty restrictions. According to this logic, Minsk cannot obtain ground-based missile weapons with a range of over 500 km.

The focus on the “500 km” figure attempts to demonstrate to the West that Western policy towards Minsk creates regional-scale problems.

Unfortunately for the regime, the INF treaty is virtually dead. NATO military planners focus on land-based missiles with a range of about 1,000 km, so the treaty’s value for the West is doubtful. An attempt to use the proliferation of shorter-range missile weapons as a bargaining chip will be perceived as Kremlin intrigue implemented via Minsk.

 

 

You have been successfully subscribed

Subscribe to our newsletter

Once a week, in coordination with a group of prominent Belarusian analysts, we provide analytical commentaries on the most topical and relevant issues, including the behind-the-scenes processes occurring in Belarus. These commentaries are available in Belarusian, Russian, and English.
EN
BE/RU
Subscribe

Situation in Belarus

July 15 – July 21
View all

Subscribe to us

Read more